Think Megan Fox is Sexy? I’ll Sell You 1 Share of “Synthetic Ownership Interest” for $10

Megan Fox is sexy. Really sexy. And if you’ve ever wanted a piece of action, you have your chance. Starting today, I’m selling 1,000 shares of “synthetic ownership interest” in Megan Fox for $10/each. It’s my version of the IPO – the Initial Pussy Offering.
If this sounds utterly ridiculous to you, the concept of a startup called OneSeason will too. Which is probably why it has raised $3.5 million in VC funding.
The concept of OneSeason is simple: turn popular athletes into stocks and allow the public to trade them in a market.
There’s only one problem, of course: you don’t own anything. Although you might be able to negotiate fractional ownership of someone like Mike Tyson, chances are that athletes like Tiger Woods and LeBron James are not going to turn incorporate, run everything through their corporations and sell off ownership interests to the public.
But that isn’t stopping OneSeason from selling shares of them.
If it sounds sketchy, that’s because it is. While I can’t be bothered to call an attorney to discuss the theoretical legal issues OneSeason raises, it takes little more than common sense to recognize that OneSeason is in effect little more than a scam regardless of whether or not it’s intentionally malicious.
The three biggest problems beyond any questions of legality:
- Nothing tangible drives the market. Since “synthetic ownership interests” are vapor, there are no underlying fundamentals (such as profits or the likelihood of a certain outcome) on which to base their value. The OneSeason homepage says “Value’s [sic] based on public perception” but this is misleading in my opinion based on the following.
- Liquidity is limited. In thinly-traded markets like OneSeason, a single person could have a considerable impact on the price of an SOI at any given time (with or without the intent of manipulation). Since OneSeason doesn’t use market makers, for instance, your ability to buy and sell SOIs is wholly dependent upon finding a counterparty for a trade. While a discussion of market markers and specialists is beyond the scope of this post, any person with reasonable sophistication recognizes the unattractive risks of such illiquid markets.
At best, OneSeason is entertainment. The fact that a dead person (Babe Ruth) is traded highlights how ludicrous OneSeason is. Unless you’re betting on the Babe rising from the dead and signing a $75 million/year deal with the Yankees, trading “synthetic ownership interests” in him makes about as much sense as trading “synthetic ownership interests” in unicorns.
Which begs the question: why involve real money in such a market anyway? ProTrade runs a similar exchange using fake currency that can later be exchanged for real prizes. Makes sense. Fake ownership interests, fake money.
While none of this is to say that there won’t be some people who get lucky and make money “trading” on OneSeason, the worst investment of all may be that of its lead investor, Charles River Ventures.
OneSeason users can only deposit a maximum of $2,500 year into their accounts because the friendly folks at OneSeason “want to ensure that this is used only for fun and entertainment purposes.”
Given this, it’s hard to see how OneSeason is ever going to attract type of volume (in terms of trades executed and total dollar value) required to grow into the type of business that VCs should be investing $3.5 million in.
For those who actually want the opportunity to make real money in sports markets, betting exchanges like Betfair and Betdaq provide the best means.
And for those who want to spend money on entertainment, contact me about my Megan Fox synthetic ownership interests. I’ll throw in some Megan Fox photos too; consider them to be your stock certificates.
At least by the time my business selling synthetic ownership interests in hot female celebrities collapses (as OneSeason eventually will), you’ll have photos to remember the good times by.
















Ah, I was afraid 2009 might have killed off the idiotic startups already.
To be generous, crossing a fantasy sports league crossed with Betfair to try to avoid US gambling laws (probably unsuccessfully) and couching it in stock market terminology is not the world’s worst idea. But the VC involvement and TechCrunch comments like “its [sic] sharing the wealth that everyone has to create a more stable economy in the interest of sport”… apparently the failtrain has a while to go yet.
Sam: so you’re not interested in a few shares of fractional ownership of Megan Fox? I’ll even let you have a few Friday nights.
Wait just a minute. Former San Fransisco 49er Ronnie Lott will be joining the company’s Advisory Board. No company with Ronnie Lott on its advisory board is capable of failing.
Will: agreed. Only companies associated with top-tier athletes like Michael Jordan can fail. Having a few second-tier athletes advising you is far more conducive to success.
Are you offering preferred stock on Megan or just common.
What about some options trading?
Tom Smykowski: It was a “Jump to Conclusions” mat. You see, it would be this mat that you would put on the floor… and would have different CONCLUSIONS written on it that you could JUMP TO.
TheHappySurfer: I own all the outstanding preferred shares of MFOX and have no interest in selling.
I do have futures contracts available. You’ll probably be more interested in the March 2050 contract. It’s in contango naturally but Megan is more likely to make love to you when she’s elderly. By then you should have sold at least 2 Internet startups for big bucks too.
PS: I do have some preferred shares of Britney Spears and am looking to sell all of them to one buyer. Interested?
Megan Fox, 40 years from now, maybe, Mary Steenburgen is a pretty hot older lady.
Preferred stock of Britney, what kind of sucker do you take me for, everyone knows that’s all common stock.
it’s like baseball cards without the cards
Indeed, since there are no dividends or underlying assets to buy back shares, the only way these shares can possibly appreciate is if more money is chasing the same amount of fake assets. Ie. if more people join. So it’s sort of like a pyramid or ponzi… One massive pump and dump, which is what happened to them in October once the early adopters pulled all the money out.