<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Batten Down The Hatches on a Shit Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drama20show.com/2008/04/03/dont-batten-down-the-hatches-on-a-shit-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drama20show.com/2008/04/03/dont-batten-down-the-hatches-on-a-shit-business/</link>
	<description>Keeping Tech Sexy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:05:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fuck Survival: If You Ain&#8217;t in It for the Money Then Get Out the Game : The Drama 2.0 Show</title>
		<link>http://www.drama20show.com/2008/04/03/dont-batten-down-the-hatches-on-a-shit-business/comment-page-1/#comment-36094</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuck Survival: If You Ain&#8217;t in It for the Money Then Get Out the Game : The Drama 2.0 Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drama20show.com/2008/04/03/dont-batten-down-the-hatches-on-a-shit-business/#comment-36094</guid>
		<description>[...] April, I advised &#8220;Don’t Batten Down The Hatches on a Shit Business&#8221; and wrote: Cost structure is very important during an economic downturn but revenue and business models are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] April, I advised &#8220;Don’t Batten Down The Hatches on a Shit Business&#8221; and wrote: Cost structure is very important during an economic downturn but revenue and business models are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKMurphy &#187; Recession Requires A Focus on Revenue</title>
		<link>http://www.drama20show.com/2008/04/03/dont-batten-down-the-hatches-on-a-shit-business/comment-page-1/#comment-7413</link>
		<dc:creator>SKMurphy &#187; Recession Requires A Focus on Revenue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drama20show.com/2008/04/03/dont-batten-down-the-hatches-on-a-shit-business/#comment-7413</guid>
		<description>[...] expense control at VC backed companies is going to be increasingly the focus at board meetings. But bootstrapping firms are born with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expense control at VC backed companies is going to be increasingly the focus at board meetings. But bootstrapping firms are born with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyndy Aleo-Carreira</title>
		<link>http://www.drama20show.com/2008/04/03/dont-batten-down-the-hatches-on-a-shit-business/comment-page-1/#comment-7296</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyndy Aleo-Carreira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 02:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drama20show.com/2008/04/03/dont-batten-down-the-hatches-on-a-shit-business/#comment-7296</guid>
		<description>But did you see Facebook grabbed one of the Google chefs? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But did you see Facebook grabbed one of the Google chefs? <img src='http://www.drama20show.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drama 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.drama20show.com/2008/04/03/dont-batten-down-the-hatches-on-a-shit-business/comment-page-1/#comment-7196</link>
		<dc:creator>Drama 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 06:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drama20show.com/2008/04/03/dont-batten-down-the-hatches-on-a-shit-business/#comment-7196</guid>
		<description>Paul: you do make a valid point but your qualification (the assumption of a long-term vision for profitability) is exactly what is lacking in Web 2.0 today.

For most Web 2.0 startups, there is rarely any long-term vision at all - only a short-term vision to get bought out for a lot of money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul: you do make a valid point but your qualification (the assumption of a long-term vision for profitability) is exactly what is lacking in Web 2.0 today.</p>
<p>For most Web 2.0 startups, there is rarely any long-term vision at all &#8211; only a short-term vision to get bought out for a lot of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.drama20show.com/2008/04/03/dont-batten-down-the-hatches-on-a-shit-business/comment-page-1/#comment-7195</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 06:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drama20show.com/2008/04/03/dont-batten-down-the-hatches-on-a-shit-business/#comment-7195</guid>
		<description>&quot;Cost structure is not winter clothing that suddenly becomes fashionable when the economy gets cold.&quot;

Love that - I will use it and properly attribute it as well :-)

Notwithstanding, it&#039;s not *always* true.  in times of hypergrowth in a market it&#039;s arguable that cost structure can be sacrificed in the short term to achieve market share (assuming a long term vision of profitability exists).  That doesn&#039;t mean that every 2.0 company pissing away money to build up eyeballs is justifiable; but it does mean that in certain circumstances, when the proper capital structure is in place, companies can ramp up their spend in order to get traction in the market during periods of high market growth when market share is more important than short term financial metrics.

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Cost structure is not winter clothing that suddenly becomes fashionable when the economy gets cold.&#8221;</p>
<p>Love that &#8211; I will use it and properly attribute it as well <img src='http://www.drama20show.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Notwithstanding, it&#8217;s not *always* true.  in times of hypergrowth in a market it&#8217;s arguable that cost structure can be sacrificed in the short term to achieve market share (assuming a long term vision of profitability exists).  That doesn&#8217;t mean that every 2.0 company pissing away money to build up eyeballs is justifiable; but it does mean that in certain circumstances, when the proper capital structure is in place, companies can ramp up their spend in order to get traction in the market during periods of high market growth when market share is more important than short term financial metrics.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
